WIKILEAKS: Obama, Clinton & Soros Overthrew Pope Benedict

Strap in folks, this is a wild one! If you've been friends with us for a while, you know we are no fans of Pope Francis.  In fact, the entire Vatican has stunk for a long,

Strap in folks, this is a wild one!

If you’ve been friends with us for a while, you know we are no fans of Pope Francis.  In fact, the entire Vatican has stunk for a long, long time.

But now it appears there may have been a coup from the outside, involving three people we like on just about the same level as Pope Francis:  Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and George Soros.

Yes, that’s right.  In a new report from Wikileaks, it’s now alleged that these three oversaw a coup to remove Pope Benedict.  How very interesting.  And who did they replace him with?  Yeah, I rest my case.

Here are more details, from Gloria TV:

George Soros, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton orchestrated a coup in the Vatican to overthrow the conservative Pope Benedict and replace him with radical leftist Pope Francis, according to a group of Catholic leaders citing evidence from various sources including WikiLeaks emails.

Pope Benedict XVI reigned as Pope of the Catholic Church from 2005 to 2013 before unexpectedly resigning in unusual circumstances. Becoming the first Pope to step down since Pope Gregory XII in 1415, Benedict is widely considered the first to do so on his own initiative since Pope Celestine V in 1294.

However the group of Catholic leaders cite new evidence uncovered in emails released by WikiLeaks to claim the conservative Pope Benedict did not actually resign on his own initiative, but was pushed out of the Vatican by a coup that the group of researchers are calling the “Catholic Spring.”

Soros, Obama and Clinton used the United States’ diplomatic machinery, political muscle, and financial power to coerce, bribe and blackmail “regime change” in the Roman Catholic Church in order to replace the conservative Benedict with the current Pope Francis – who has since become an unlikely mouthpiece for the international left, stunning Catholics around the world.

Now the group of Catholic leaders have sent a letter to President Trump urging him to launch an official investigation into the activities of George Soros, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton (and others) who they allege were involved in orchestrating Catholic Spring that resulted in their goal of “regime change” in the Vatican.

The Catholic leaders cite eight specific questions they seek to have answered concerning suspect events that led to the resignation of Pope Benedict, the first papal abdication in 700 years.

“Specifically, we have reason to believe that a Vatican ‘regime change’ was engineered by the Obama administration,” say the petitioners, in their January 20 letter to President Trump.

“We were alarmed to discover,” their letter notes, “that, during the third year of the first term of the Obama administration your previous opponent, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and other government officials with whom she associated proposed a Catholic ‘revolution’ in which the final demise of what was left of the Catholic Church in America would be realized.”

The letter includes links to documents and news stories underscoring their claims. It first directs attention to the notorious Soros-Clinton-Podesta e-mails disclosed last year by WikiLeaks, in which Podesta and other progressives discussed regime change to remove what they described as the “middle ages dictatorship” in the Catholic Church.

Regarding the Podesta e-mails in question, The New American reported last October:

“Podesta, a longtime Clinton adviser/confidante and hand-picked top activist for left-wing funder George Soros, revealed in a 2011 e-mail that he and other activists were working to effect a “Catholic Spring” revolution within the Catholic Church, an obvious reference to the disastrous “Arab Spring” coups organized that same year by the Obama-Clinton-Soros team that destabilized the Middle East and brought radical Islamist regimes and terrorist groups to power in the region.The Podesta e-mail is a response to another Soros-funded radical — Sandy Newman, founder of the “progressive” Voices for Progress. Newman had written to Podesta seeking advice on the best way to “plant the seeds of the revolution” in the Catholic Church, which he described as a “middle ages [sic] dictatorship.”

In their letter to President Trump, the group of Catholics leaders write: “Approximately a year after this e-mail discussion, which was never intended to be made public, we find that Pope Benedict XVI abdicated under highly unusual circumstances and was replaced by a pope whose apparent mission is to provide a spiritual component to the radical ideological agenda of the international left. The Pontificate of Pope Francis has subsequently called into question its own legitimacy on a multitude of occasions.”

“We remain puzzled by the behavior of this ideologically charged Pope, whose mission seems to be one of advancing secular agendas of the left rather than guiding the Catholic Church in Her sacred mission,” they say, expressing the thoughts of millions of Catholics around the world stunned by Pope Francis’s left-wing ideology. “It is simply not the proper role of a Pope to be involved in politics to the point that he is considered to be the leader of the international left.”

Not to us, O Lord, not to us,
But to Your name be the glory
Because of Your love and your faithfulness!

chris@langpaul.com

Review overview
  • nunyadambznss

    Any catholics going to see their religion for what it is yet? Still following a man instead of Christ…Please see the light

    • bob martin

      Guess your religion interprets Matthew 16:13-20.in a way that justifies your stance. Catholic’s believe that they have strong grounds for their belief.

      https://www.catholic.com/tract/peter-the-rock

      • nunyadambznss

        Using the old “Jesus said he’ll build his church on Peter” argument eh? Peter never went to Rome nor did he build catholicism so there’s really no other way to justify what Matthew 16: 13-20 says other than Jesus intended for Peter to be the one to spread the Gospel after He was gone. In no way did he say “Build a whole governmental body/religion and you be the head after I’m gone and completely disregard many of the commandments I’ve given you in the past and my mom will be on the same level as me too”. As it stands any religion today that goes by the bible could claim to be built by Jesus himself considering without Jesus there would be no church or new testament at all. Catholicism may have had good intentions in the beginning but has turned into RELIGION instead of a RELATIONSHIP with Christ. Justify anything you wish but the pope also referred to as the vicar (substitute, deputy, representative) of Christ over all of the catholic church is far from being anywhere near representative much less a substitute for Him. That is the leader of the whole organization? I’d like to know what scriptures justify mary as being anything more than the young girl God chose to be the vessel for Christ to come into the world? Where’s it mention her being sinless? Where does it mention her being “queen” of anything? It’s not exactly rocket science to see catholicism is flawed unless you’re brought up being brainwashed into believing the lies. I won’t reply back so before the “your religion yada yada yada” begins know that I’m am not a part of any religion, do not go to church but have read the bible through and through more than a few times. My beliefs are based solely on what is written not what has been told to me to be the truth. If you can’t say the same for your beliefs or even that you’ve read the bible through and through more than a few times it would be wise to read ALL of it and disregard anything you believe to be truth if you find scripture against it.

        • bob martin

          Oh, horse pucky. I could care less if you don’t share my faith. I look upon that as your problem, not mine. You need to quit picking fights with those who love Jesus. I’ll rely on Aquinas for my metaphysical thoughts. Have a nice after life.

    • el lobo

      Catholics distinguish between Christ and the pope just like they distinguished between Him and Peter. Did you get it?

    • MzT

      Have a good friend who is Catholic to the core, so she would not believe anything against Pope Frank, if it bit her on the behind. It’s pretty much a waste of time to argue with a dyed-in-the-wool Catholic – they take “Ex Cathedra” literally. I grew up Catholic, but found my way over to making a personal commitment to the Lord Jesus Christ in my mid 20s. Now when I read Catholic literature, it just doesn’t make any sense.

  • Casey Dawson

    The false prophet is on the scene….

    • el lobo

      A prophet and a pope have two different missions from God. Your terminology is way off.

      • matt93312

        Your loyalty to tradition is admirable. You should consider following the earliest tradition who’s head is Christ. Despite the RCC’s insistence that all prophecy has been fulfilled, we are seeing it unfold before our very eyes. Your loyalty won’t be counted as merit when you live in willful deception.

        Rev 22:7 “Behold, I am coming quickly! Blessed is he who keeps the words of the prophecy of this book.”

  • Michael Pawlikowski

    There was originally a very weird quote from Joe Biden – he was disappointed an American pope was not elected. He said something about the power that would have given America.

    • el lobo

      A pope is elected for the good of the world, not for his country and people alone. That is why he chooses on a new name. He loses his name and country.

      Joe Biden who professes to be Catholic is lost.

  • Rusalka

    The question I have is: Do modern Catholics take every word the Pope says as how you should live your life? If yes, OMG! If no, good for you. Popes are like Presidents, they come and go, well eventually. I have a Catholic background and I side with the “no” crowd.

    • el lobo

      The pope is only as good as his teachings of the Catholic Doctrines. No pope is above the truth of Christ. When he deviates from these truths, he loses his credibility and appeal with the faithful. He is still allowed to stay on as pope in the hope that he can change his ways just like individual Catholics are given time by God to change his ways. The pope is given the respect of a sitting pope with his time allotted by God. In the end of his life, if this pope does not retract his heresies, he is later declared an anti-pope.

      Unlike Protestant Churches and cults, their pastors can change his teachings or deviate from truth while most of his members stay on as members. For this very reason, it is the Protestant Churches that become what they accuse Catholics of with their pope- followers of humans instead of Christ. Other Protestants who defect choose a sect that conforms to their personal belief as if they are choosing food from a cafeteria. Others who prefer to be “non denominational Christians” become their own pope and their own member of their own sect.

      It is a serious business for the good of your immortal soul to note the truths of God and to act on these truth rather than just go with the daily hyperboles propagated by the demonic common currents. To blunder because of foolhardiness, laziness or arrogance will have an eternal consequence.

      Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam

  • Deplorable J Covfefe III

    It didn’t do them much good. Hillary lost.

  • el lobo

    The 3- stooges of Hussein, Hillary and Soros may have engineered a maneuver to remove the true pope, but God engineered for their removal from their positions of power. In fact, God allowed this to happen because now we can see clearly that Catholics do not just follow popes like they would with Christ. Without the pope following Church Doctrines, the pope’s appeal to the Catholic public is simply ignored. This pope’s Masonic masters must be furious that all their time, effort and money is not panning out in ultimately destroying this Church that sits on the Rock of Peter.

    Pope Benedict XVI, must still be the true pope of Christ if his abdication was a coercion. This is probably what he meant when he said that there is a pope who runs the daily administration and, there is a pope who runs the spiritual (not his exact words).

    “In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph; the pope will consecrate Russia,” said Our Lady of Fatima. I believe it would be Pope Benedict XVI who will do that consecration. The other pope has no interest in doing so.

    • S.C.Murf

      Peter is not the rock
      up the hill
      airborne

  • Mikie Snaxx

    Religion is the number one enemy of Socialism/Communism which is what Hillary planned for America.